Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space. According to Exercise 1.1.3 in GTM249, if $f\in L^{p_0}(X,\mu)$ for some $p_0<\infty$, then

\[\lim_{p\rightarrow \infty}\parallel f\parallel_{L^p}=\parallel f\parallel_{L^\infty}\]

This is the reason why we sometimes say that the limit of $L^p$ is $L^\infty$. Can we see this from another perspective? That is, is the statement still true if we interpret the limit here as the categorical limit? Let’s include the assumption that $\mu(X)$ is finite. Then for every pair of real numbers $p,q$ such that $p\leq q$, $1\leq p\leq q<\infty$, we have

\[L^q(X)\subset L^p(X)\]

If we view $\mathcal{P}(L^1(X))$ and $[1,\infty)$ as poset categories, then the above inclusion suggests that we have a diagram of type $[1,\infty)$, i.e. a functor from $[1,\infty)$ to $\mathcal{P}(L^1(X))$. Since $\bigcap_{p\in [1,\infty)}L^p(X)$ is the limit of this diagram, the question in the headline is just a fancy version of the following question:

Is $L^\infty(X)$ equal to $\bigcap_{p\in [1,\infty)}L^p(X)$ ?

Unfortunately, the answer is no in general. We will give an example here. Consider the measure space $([0,1],m)$ ($m$ is the Lebesgue measure) and the following function defined on $[0,1]$:

\[\begin{align*} f(x)=\begin{cases} 1, & x\in (\frac{1}{2},1]\\ 2, & x\in (\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{2}]\\ \vdots\\ n, & x\in (\frac{1}{2^n},\frac{1}{2^{n-1}}]\\ \end{cases} \end{align*}\]

Clearly $f\notin L^\infty([0,1])$. However, it is in $L^p([0,1])$ for every $p\in [1,\infty)$ because

\[\parallel f\parallel_{L^p}^p=\int_0^1|f|^pdm=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{n^p}{2^n}\]

which can be proved to be convergent by using the ratio test.


<
Previous Post
Uniqueness of the Euclidean Topology
>
Next Post
An Exercise about Uniform Integrability